the charts below show information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
The given bar chart illustrates a substantial discrepancy of the number of marriages and divorces the percentage of marital status of men and women Americans over the 30-year period, 1970 and 2000.
Overall, it is remarkable that the year 1970 and 1980 accounted for the highest of marriages in comparison with the others. Besides, the percentage of Americans getting divorced was the lowest at that time.
Regarding the first bar chart, there are similar numbers of marriages, moreover, not only was they constitute 2.5 million people but they also were the highest. Meanwhile, the number of divorces in 1980 was twice lower than that of marriages that occupied 2.5 million. With regard to the divorces and marriages, there was an downward trend, except the figure of divorces 1970 followed an opposite trend.
As far as the second bar chart is concerned, the percentage of men and women getting married stood at 70% and 60% in 1970 and 2000 respectively, which was the highest. By contrast, the lowest was under 10% of the proportion of adults getting divorced in 1970, whereas, that of widowed in 2000 made up the lowest with nearly 10%.
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences through out the day in 1992. 61
- Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who cannot read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- the graph below gives infomation on households with a regular use of a car in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 65
- Today our lifestyle is changing and affects family relationships Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages 75
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...o the divorces and marriages, there was an downward trend, except the figure of di...
^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vorces 1970 followed an opposite trend. As far as the second bar chart is concer...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, moreover, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96875 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62100804267 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.538927314 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219566129283 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10097534466 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645321754183 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151226820223 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652550343609 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.