The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.
The three bar charts illustrate changes of average years of schooling, how many scientists and technicians and expenditure spending on research and development in developing countries and industrialised countries between 1980 and 1990.
Overall, It is obvious that the figures for industrialised countries were much higher than that for developing countries. Another interesting point is that there was a general upward trend in taking part in education and science over the period in question.
Looking at the detail, by 1980, the number of average years of schooling in developing countries accounted for around 3 years, which was only one third that of industrialised countries. The figure increased slightly in developing countries, while a bigger change can be seen in industrialised countries, reaching nearly 11 years in 1990.
There were only around 10 scientists and technicians per 1000 people in developing countries in 1980, then went up to nearly 20 in 1990. The figure in industrialised countries was nearly double to approximately 70 per 1000 people in 1990. If we look at spending on research and development, industrialised countries invested more money that developing countries, at around 150 million dollars in 1980 to about 350 million dollars in 1990. By contrast, developing countries spent only about 50 billion dollars in 1980, after that fell by a half in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007. 67
- the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010. 67
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 67
- the graph below shows information about consumption of spreads from 1989 to 2007. summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38073394495 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13883835251 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9111346766 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392593584048 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177218761431 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709074727105 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249229653808 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716900838198 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.