The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support the received from employers.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The bar graphs represent the proportion of two types of studying motivation of learners from under 26 years old to 49 years old and how much assistance they acquire from employers. In general, in can be seen that the main learning purpose of young students is for career, while this tendency changes into learning for interest when people are older.
First of all, in the under 20 years old group, 80% learners study because of career. In contrast, this figure for the over 49 years old group is significantly lower than aforementioned group, it is only about 19%. When people are from 40 to 49 years old, the percentages of the two studying motivations, for interest and career, are balanced and similar, 50% and 50% respectively.
About the assistance from employers, there are more than 75% people in the group of under 26 years old receive support from their labor owners. The proportion of people given assistance from employers reduces slightly when their age increase to 39, from 75% in people under 26 to only just over 30% the numbers of people from 30 to 38 years old. And this is the lowest percentage of people who are given support among all the groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-30 | FalexPingu | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 to 1996.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 67
- Evaluate a public place Suggest how it could be made more appealing It should be 500 words 10 in length 36
- Most schools offer some type of physical education program to their students Is physical education important in the 21st century Should physical education classes be required or optional 84
- It is important to ensure that children with a wide range of abilities and from a variety of social backgrounds mix with each other at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Some people believe the benefits of tourism outweigh the problems it creates in particular place Discuss both views and give your own opinion 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st and career, are balanced and similar, 50% and 50% respectively. About the ass...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, in contrast, in general, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74019607843 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53981653123 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9241468287 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.875 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158233964323 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799863751501 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271808335397 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114834651536 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145947457331 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.