The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart compares the percentage of study reasons from different age groups and the number of employer who gives support to them. Overall, there are more students from age group under 26 who study for career and like to get time off with more money.

From the details, it is clear that the employer support the under 26 group mostly. It is reversed in the 30-39 age group who are least supported by the employer. In over 40 age group mostly students study for their interest and is the most high percentage with 70% of it. Although under 26 age group is the highest percentage who study for career, but it is contrary with the student who study for interest. In the age of 40-49 group, it is equal to who study for career and interest.

Under 26 age which is teens wanted more to study for career rather than to study for interest. It is opposite to the group of age over 49, which they rather to study for interest. Employer, rather to hire younglings because they are more productive. That is why the under 26 age group mostly study for career

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-28 despair 73 view
2019-06-12 pqh2612002 61 view
2019-05-15 Adewumi Akinwale 11 view
2018-09-08 Brian Loe 61 view
2018-09-08 Fthytrfr 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'students'?
Suggestion: students
...upport to them. Overall, there are more student from age group under 26 who study for c...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44329896907 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15463917526 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417525773196 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0041318757 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.3636363636 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248361819992 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133047416338 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477101767669 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204173089 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277931098969 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.