The two given graphs demonstrate why people study and the supports they receive from employers in term of time and financial. All data are shown in percentages and the target group are students under 26 to over 49.
The first paragraph indicates the purpose to which students study. When people grow older, the motivation of pursuing knowledge for working decreases where the incentive for enjoyment goes up, as the index applies for people under 40 and over 49. Interestingly, those in their forties revealed that both reasons they study are equal, of 40%.
For the second paragraph, the supports each generation received varies differently. Obviously, students under 26 revealed to gain the highest help of over 60%. This is followed by age group of 26-29 with 50% of aid. People between 30-39 receive the least help with the proportion of about 30% which is approximately 2 times lower higher than the aid first group age get. The last two generations’ percentages of employer support rise indicrementally, in which the data are sequently 35% and 40%.
From these perspectives, we can conlude that students under thirties study mostly for their career and receive consider supports. As we grow older and start pursuing knowledge for enjoyment, the helps gradually decrease.
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 11
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount ofsupport they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write 67
- Children nowadays watch significantly more television than in the past, which reduces their activity levels accordingly. Why is this case?What measures can you suggest to encourage higher levels of activity among children? 95
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of thepopulation between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecompari 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st help with the proportion of about 30% which is approximately 2 times lower hig...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1875 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82194338357 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600961538462 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0123435629 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9166666667 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165747752554 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609959714771 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332836796017 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106512956185 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013002404605 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.