A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material
possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem
important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
As the world grows more and more briskly, it is crucial to be have a specific position and to have self-enjoyment. However, those cannot and never be the measure to evaluate a personal value. I totally disagree with the statement that, “People are judged only according to public status and material. Passé values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important”.
To begin with, social status and material ownerships – from my standpoint, can never be put on measurement to any personal evaluation. Who can clarify that one’s status was made from his/her own achievements, or from some vague reasons? As also with material owning, we cannot respect one just because he/she is wearing luxurious shoes – because nobody knows whether that possesion belongs to that person, or whether the owner had to spend months of his/her salary to purchase that goods?
Moreover, I think that personal characteristics’ values, for instance integrity, compassion and reliance – given by the topic, are definite the exact qualification to assess anyone. Ones can fake their fortune, their positions but cannot fake their traits. With natural instinct, we can to some extent analyze the honest of the person we meet. And it is undeniable that we would communicate with person with good feature and no property rather than one who has tremendous assets but poor manner.
In conclusion, the inside trait of everyone is the definite object to assess oneself. As long as one’s trait is qualified, we can make relationship, no matter how much is their fortune. With good characteristics, admirable public position or superior property will be obtained by time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-23 | Hanh Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2017-01-23 | Hanh Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2016-07-23 | Tamara | 73 | view |
| 2015-03-11 | yaya | 60 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two differentcountries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of thepopulation between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecompari 78
- Children nowadays watch significantly more television than in the past, which reduces their activity levels accordingly. Why is this case?What measures can you suggest to encourage higher levels of activity among children? 95
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount ofsupport they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write 91
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27037037037 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99704701487 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614814814815 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0869217232 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.642857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226880440531 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824220974627 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862789536701 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138301772737 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882565164614 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.