The charts below show the number of visitors arriving in a particular country for a short trip, and the number of residents leaving that country for a short trip, from 2009 to 2011.
The shown line graph shows data about the number of tourists arriving in a specific nation for a short trip, and the amount of people leaving that country for a short trip, from 2009 to 2011.Overall, the tourists arriving in that specific country and the inhabitants leaving their own country for a short journey increased progressively until October the 2010 when it started to move in the opposite directions. Additionally, the number of the travellers coming to a specific country was always more than the people who went out of their country for a trip.
According to the graph, both residents and tourists travellers increased gradually and approximately at the same rate from October 2009 to October 2010. The number of residents who departed started at 550 in October 2009 and rose to 605 thousand people in October 2010. While in the same period, the visitor arrival climbed from 490 to just above 520 thousand people in October 2010. After October 2010, the number of residents departed continues to increase dramatically and arrived at 650 thousands people in June 2011, While, for one reason or another the number of arriving visitors dropped slowly and reached 495000 tourists in June 2011.
Initially, the number of departure residents was higher than arrival visitors with roughly 70 thousand tourists. Additionally, the number of tourist arrivals was lower than the inhabitant departures although it reached the peak. Towards the end of the period, the resident departures were 1.3 times higher than the visitor departures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...try for a short trip, from 2009 to 2011.Overall, the tourists arriving in that specific...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o went out of their country for a trip. According to the graph, both residents a...
^^^
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the same period, the visitor arrival climbed from 490 to just above 520 thous...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.188 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6844172552 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.3886167143 43.030603864 224% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.111111111 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433914665103 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168738869696 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140781801039 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280355178247 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17490184608 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.