The charts below show one government's spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in Arts events in the same years.
The charts illustrate information about government's outcome on culture and education between 1995 and 2005, and the rate of people participating in arts events, in the same years. Overall, most people attended art events to watch music arts, while searched literature was the least that people participated on the event. Furthermore, the government-subsidized a lot of money on music, whereas literature amount was the lowest devoted during the period.
Looking at the first chart, the government was expended most of their consideration on music and visual arts started in 1995. However, after one decade it went down slightly for music, while visual arts dipped enormously. Additionally, for the theatre and music, there was increased significantly by the end of the period.
Turning into the second chart, there was a dramatic increase in all types of Arts Events except for visual arts. In addition, the highest total of people entered a specific event was music in the year 1995 and 2005 by around 25.000 at approximately 125.000 and 150.000. Moreover, the theatre was above 50.000 in 1995 then rose slightly in 2005. Likewise, the number of people joined in the Literature slight growth although in both years were just under 50.000. Lastly, visual arts was 50.000 participants, before it dropped minimally below 50.000.
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets. 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market. 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 73
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, likewise, look, moreover, second, then, whereas, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28773584906 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88763629916 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599056603774 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6904136239 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.909090909 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296268066042 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116433484463 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114024576761 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20540152605 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109880972617 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.