The charts below show part of the results of an extensive public survey on people s attitude to a range of issues

The chart provided indicates partially data about how people think towards a variety of issues in an extensive public survey.

It is apparent from the supplied data that education was by far more concerned than transportation and health. In addition, public services taxes were agreed to be raised.

One particular fact highlighted by the figure is that in terms of more investment in education, precisely 70% in the percentage of people answered yes, compared to 20% and 10% in that of those saying no and do not know respectively. With regard to higher transportation investment, the figure for opponents accounted for a vast majority of 85% while there was just one in ten in the figure for supporters and 5% in that for neutral people. Above all else, in the survey of whether money should be more invested in health than education, the figure for supporters far exceeded the others, occupying with two-fifths. Meanwhile, the percentages of people answering do not know and no bore a striking resemblance, constituting at 30%.

When it comes to whether taxes should be raised, the largest point was the proportion of people concurring, at over 50%, followed by that of those opposing with roughly 47%. However, the figure for neutral interviewees was about 3%.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in addition, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07619047619 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90318458346 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585714285714 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6710552815 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100954169806 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477324086455 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746751496166 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863098354866 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964379344565 0.0819641961636 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.