The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below.
» You should write at least 150 words.
The pie chart illustrates, how much money spend on average family for the restaurant food in percentage wise four different years. While, the line graph demonstrates, the ratio of outside meals and homemade foods from 1970 to 2000.
Overall, food budget on restaurant meals increase and home cooking decrease over the years and distributed equally at the end of period. Meanwhile, the average number of fast food meals has a dramatic growth in comparison with sit down restaurant meals.
As is observed in the pie chart, the percentage of home cooking was significantly high in 1970 with 90%. Whereas, after 10 years food budget on restaurant food contributed to 15% and reached to 35% by 1990. However, the amount of money spent on restaurant food and home cooking made of half percentage in total budget at the end of the period.
Regarding fast food and hotel food begun at 20 meals per year in 1970, whereas, later 10 years restaurant meals climbed to 35 meals per year which is 10 times higher than fast food. While, in the following years, the growth of fast food has considerably higher than sit down restaurant with 55 meals per year in 1980. In comparison, the number of people who went on restaurant was slightly increase to 45 and climbed to 50 at the end of the period. whilst, in junk food eaters ratio was rapidly increased 55 and surged to 90 by 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | kaka singh | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Annie442 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | rahulsd | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to consider when buying a product (such as a cellphone) or a service (e.g medical treatment) do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people think that nowadays children have too much feeedom What extend do younagree or disagree 53
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes( for example, working for charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to the younger children) to what extent do you agree? 67
- Some people think personal happiness is directly related to economic success while others believe this depends on other factors Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...restaurant food and home cooking made of half percentage in total budget at the e...
^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whilst
...climbed to 50 at the end of the period. whilst, in junk food eaters ratio was rapidly ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73333333333 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56087007784 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4875 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0724569832 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.272727273 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402249330492 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171437899513 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877070764548 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277120094161 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445101627953 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.