Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams, e.g. football. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports, e.g. tennis and swimming. Discuss about views and give your own opinion.

It is often discussed about the difference and benefit of individual games and team play. However, both games are beneficial for the sportsman and the society with various reasons. In my opinion solitary games like athletics, tennis and so on provide single person to elaborate their own capability and somehow, many others might be neglected because, only group items allowed to by stand the remaining players.

On the one hand, someone who argue about individual sports items benefits may be because of the availability and chances. In other words, such games has less possibility to participate because there would be a one or two representative among a group like school, universities, states, or nation. For example, athlete P T Usha was the only person who attend the national Olympics representative of Indian. Moreover, such plays have limited availability like once in a year, or sometimes once in a four years and so on.

Many people oppose to individual games because the group of people can participate and every members get a chance to enhance their inborn talent in between. for instance, Football and Cricket makes eleven members to participate a single game and sometimes they can accommodate three or four other members to the team as a reliever. Furthermore, these types of sports items provide many teams or players to indispensable chance by many clubs or international companies. For instance, Manchester united conduct football tournament in every year other than national games.

However, in my opinion, as per the participation method as a tool makes up group items in a peak level. In addition, numerous chances of play ground availability may lead to the members involvement and liability towards self and to the associated team which helps to economical growth of a nation to the core.

To sum up, neither individual nor team items have various types of advantages in one way or other. nevertheless, individual items give lower proportion of participation than group items.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...enhance their inborn talent in between. for instance, Football and Cricket makes el...
^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...lay ground availability may lead to the members involvement and liability towards self...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity may lead to the members involvement and liability towards self and to the as...
^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...d to the associated team which helps to economical growth of a nation to the core. To s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...ypes of advantages in one way or other. nevertheless, individual items give lower proportion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19384615385 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93530398212 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8728465758 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126910803262 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472274595024 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468503922553 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733882266237 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382477740285 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.