The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below.
The series of pie charts reveals the changing pattern of budget that was spent by general families on restaurants from 1970 to 2000, whereas the comparison of the popularity of fast food and sitdown restaurant over the same period was manifested in the line graph.
As shown from the information provided, the percentage of budget for dining in restaurant by an average family significantly increased over the three decades. Standing at 10% and 15% in 1970 and 1980 respectively, the ratio approximately tripled in 80's. In 2000, the money spent on eating out was at the same level of that of home cooking.
In respect to the demands over two types of catering service providers, the popularity of both fast food shop and sit-down restaurant registered a remarkable growth over the 40-year period. In spite of the identical figure of 20 meals per year in 1970, sit-down restaurant gained its prevalence up to 50 meals per year in 2000, while the surge from 1980 ensured the staggering growth of fast food meals overtook its counterpart in 1990, reaching over 80 meals per year in 2000.
Overall, the fast food had grown in importance over this period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | kaka singh | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Annie442 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | rahulsd | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
- The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 89
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc 77
- Some companies spend a lot of money on scientific research and use animals for testing Many argue that this is for a just cause while others say otherwise Do the advantages of using animals in research outweigh its disadvantages Support your answer with s 86
- Many teachers assign homework to students every day. Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students?Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'chart'.
Suggestion: chart
The series of pie charts reveals the changing pattern of budget ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...arkable growth over the 40-year period. In spite of the identical figure of 20 mea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91836734694 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71052370872 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.8744683734 43.030603864 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.714285714 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276590000949 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113773608822 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728226293694 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153910228473 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522024784782 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.