The four pie charts compare the proportion of people working in divergent positions( manufacturing, sales and service) in towns A and B between 1960 and 2010.
It can be seen that the percentage of service workers experienced a significant increase, surpassing manufacturing to become the most common in 2010, whereas, in town B, services increased slightly. Both proportions of manufacturing workers in towns A and B decrease significantly. There is a slight decrease in sales positions in town A while the corresponding figure in town B increased slightly.
In 1960, manufacturing accounted for the most percentage with 41%. The percentage of people working in sales was relatively the same as that in service, at 29% and 30% respectively. Meanwhile, in town B, people working in manufacturing were by far the most prevalent sector (70%). The proportion of sales workers was 20% which was double higher than that of services.
In 2010, the figure for the service sector in town A increased significantly to 61%, accounted more than half of the total. Manufacturing made up 20% of the proportion of people working in town A which was 2 times lower than that of town B. The figure for sale worker in town A and town B was 16% and 22% respectively.
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants why do you think people waste food what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away 78
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d town B was 16% and 22% respectively.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94761904762 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1887308659 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461904761905 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5085747881 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4545454545 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63636363636 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27495600262 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121826691467 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684116238235 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195481246036 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504874108624 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.