The line chart illistrates how many fast food meals and sitdown restaurant meals people had per year from 1970 to 2000.
As can be seen clearly that the number of 2 types of meals started at the same lowest rank, at 20. Then, both of them decreased and got the highest point in 2000.
From 1970 to 1980, the number of fast food meals had a slight increase from 20 to 30. After that, this number grown up speedly and continuously. People spent money on fast food meals more and more.In 1990, the number of fast food meals people ate was 55 and it got the peak at nearly 90 after a year.
In term of the number of sitdown restaurant meals, having the same trend with fast food meals, in 1970, this number had a mild upward. And it got a higher point than fast food meals in 1980.However, from 1980 to 2000, people wasted money on sitdown restaurant meals wans't so much as on fast food meals.The number of this type of meals grown slightly to around 45 in 1990 and got the peak at nearly 50 in 2000. Nevertheless, this number was still extremely lower than fast food meals's and the distance between them was 40.
Overall, the number of fast food meals consumed in 2000 made up the most significant figure.
- The line graph shows estimated sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of Dirhams 70
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years The graph shows the average number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants per family 56
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 58
- Children should always follow their parents parents advice To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people had per year from 1970 to 2000. As can be seen clearly that the number o...
^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... money on fast food meals more and more.In 1990, the number of fast food meals peo...
^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...gher point than fast food meals in 1980.However, from 1980 to 2000, people wasted money...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...als wanst so much as on fast food meals.The number of this type of meals grown slig...
^^^
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...theless, this number was still extremely lower than fast food mealss and the dist...
^^
Line 7, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mealss and the distance between them was 40. Overall, the number of fast food ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45333333333 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17221057115 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9617672734 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29085495618 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13073066851 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853647527832 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187196282242 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819630566223 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 91.44 61.2550243902 149% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.