The pie chart illustrates the rates of money which was spent on restaurants and homemade cooking, while the line graph gives information about the changes of fast food and sit down restaurants from 1970 to 2000.
Overall, the cost of home cooking decreased annually but people tend to eat out of home over the time period. Even though the number of fast food and sit down places were similar at the beginning of the period, the former extremely increased, while the latter rose steadily.
The amount of money used in restaurants was only one tenth in 1970, whereas rest of the budget was spent on home cooked meal. However, in 2000, expenditure of restaurants grew by 40% and home cooking fell to 50%.
Regarding the line graph, the number of junk foods firstly increased gradually from 20 to about 30 in 1980 and then sharply raised in 1990 before it peaked at almost 90 at the end of period. Likewise, the quantity of sit-down meals frequently experienced an up-ward trend, beginning with 20 and ending up with approximately 50.
- some people say that government must apply high taxes to provide good public services for everyone.Give your opinion? 78
- The diagram below shows the process for making a water clock. 78
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below shows how salt is removed from sea water to make it drinkable. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, likewise, regarding, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82122905028 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52604176302 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631284916201 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3950603383 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233450166657 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985660757444 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682667501715 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137174590663 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535191581403 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.