The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in differents years. The grap shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurant and sit down restaurants.
The presented pie chart illustrates the food budget that people spent on restaurant meals and home cooking was calculated in percentage from 1970 to 2000. Meanwhile, the line chart shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants during 30 years.
Overall, money which were used for restaurant meals climbed sharply and the total of meals which were in fast food restaurant had a steepy growth.
In term of propotion of food fund spent on restaurant meals in 1970 accounted for 10%, rose moderately in 1990 to 15% before reaching at peak (50%) in 2000. On the other hand, in 1970, the expenditure on home cooking made up 90% which were more 80% than that of on restaurant meals. After that, it experienced a huge fall at about 50% in 2000.
According to the second chart, the number of fast food meals started at 20 in 1970, at the same point of sitdown restaurant meals. In the period from 1980 to 1990, the number of meals in which people enjoyed fast food and sitdown restaurant increased day by day, nearly 60 meals and 45 meals per year. Then, the number of fast food meals reached its highest level in 2000, at close to 90 meals, more 40 meals than the number of sitdown restaurant meals at the same time.
- : Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Levels of unemloyment in 3 countries 79
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in differents years. The grap shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurant and sit down restaurants. 56
- the charts below show the percentage of the food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The grap shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurant and sitdown restaurants. 56
- : Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59641255605 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36655767437 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506726457399 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6219957827 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.888888889 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452239587352 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217942154658 0.103423049105 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148435915007 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303358249541 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157977824837 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.