The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts below illustrate the proportion of total water usage by five sectors in Sydney, in two years 1997 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of water used by the food industry was largest in both years. Besides that, the proportion of total water usage by service industry almost doubled from 1997 to 2007.
There was a small decrease in the percentage of water usage by food industry from 48% in 1997 to 41% in 2007. Although the proportion of this industry had dropped 7% for ten years, it always occupied the highest fraction in both charts. Besides, the percentage of total water used by manufacturing and building industry also slightly fell from 15% and 5% in 1997 to 11% and 2% in 2007, respectively.
In contrast, the proportion of total water usage by service industry increased dramatically from 13% in 1997 to 26% in 2007. Because of this jump almost double in ten years, the part of total water used by this industry gained the second largest in the pie chart in 2007. The percentage of water usage by household use also grew slightly 3% from 19% at the beginning of the period.
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding. 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on theprotection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the humanpopulation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 19% at the beginning of the period.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67676767677 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51141664198 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459595959596 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.1259632211 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21949052099 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117852696053 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615077748974 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174482415709 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434261590991 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.