The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The pie graphs below compare the percentages of the population in three different age groups, in two nations, in 2000 and 2050.
Overall, people in both countries are going to grow older in the next 50 years. Therefore, the age group 0-14 tends to decrease in the future.
By 2000, just over half of the population aged 0-14 in Yemen while this figure was 14.3% in Italy. Besides, people who aged 15-59 accounted for 46.3% and 61.6%, in Yemen and Italy, respectively. The group aged over 60 occupied 3.6% of the inhabitants of Yemen while this number in Italy was almost a quarter of the population.
By 2050, in Yemen, while people aged 15-59 are expected to grow rapidly from 46.3% to 57.3%, the children aged under 15 are anticipated to drop dramatically to 37%. In Italy, although the group aged 15-59 is predicted to decrease quickly to 46.2%, people aged over 60 tend to rise nearly double from 24,1% (2000).
- Many university students live with their families, while others live awayfrom home because their universities are in different places. What are theadvantages and disadvantages of both situations? 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- The line charts compare the number of people who emigrate and immigrate in the UK while the bar graph shows the net of migration between 1999 and 2008. 73
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on theprotection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the humanpopulation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72670807453 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4221054174 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6257183829 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.125 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269878606775 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121258520766 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674561370863 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162786762803 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813138584163 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.