The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
The pie charts compare six different areas in terms of water used for industrial, agriculture and domestic.
It’s clear that more water is consumed by industrial than by agriculture or domestic in North America and Europe. By contrast, agriculture accounted for the vast majority of water used in South America, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia.
The percentage of water used for industrial, agriculture and domestic is quite similar in North America and Europe, and so a strong correlation is suggested. Industrial water consumption accounted for 48% and 53% of the total water usage. By contrast, a mere 13% and 15% of water is used for domestic. Furthermore, agriculture water use accounts for 39% and 32% respectively.
Agriculture water consumption was highest in four different areas namely South America, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia. South America was the lowest about 71% and Central Asia accounted for a massive 88% of water usage. Furthermore, just 5% of water used for industrial in Central Asia, this figure was not as much as half in South East Asia. In Africa, residential water consumption accounted for 9%, compared to only 7% of water used for industrial.
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement 56
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 78
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of traveling to a workplace Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 78
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14871794872 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87365324487 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5855861028 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2727272727 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302101988498 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159624832553 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884229989079 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239950427853 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10499094013 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.