The Charts below show the proportion of British students at one university who were able to speak another language in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The pie charts illustrate the rate of British students who know how to speak another language besides English in 2000 and 2010. The information shows that the number of students with different language knowledge is different in these two years.
First of all, the information about the year 2000 indicates that 30% of students can speak Spanish in addition to English. Also, 15% of them know French, and 10 % know how to use German. It should be noted that 15% of British students speak another language except the Spanish, French, and German. Additionally, 10% of them speak two other languages besides English. Furthermore, 20% of British students do not know any other foreign languages.
Second, the information about the year 2010 shows that the rate of British students knowing Spanish is increased and it is 35% this year. Also, 10% of students can speak French, which is decreased in comparison to 2000. Additionally, 10% of students can use German, which is as same as the year 2000. 20% of students know another language except for the mentioned ones, and 15% of them can speak two other languages in addition to English. It should be pointed out that only 10% of students can not speak a foreign language.
In general, the information about these two years shows that most of the students can speak Spanish. Moreover, the number of students who can only use and talk English is decreased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-23 | raminghorbanii | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relev 61
- The Charts below show the proportion of British students at one university who were able to speak another language in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.Agree or Disagree? 56
- Some people believe that employment over the age of 60 is not right and creates lots of problems. So people should retire after 60 and not work.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, except for, in addition, in general, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56731301057 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403361344538 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.928980758 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323621209753 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140125184287 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911834338145 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244827115207 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699743067945 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.6 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.