The two pie charts present information about British students who are fluent in other languages.
Overall, the Spain hold the first place over the two period of time.Also, the people who can speak only one language hold second position in 2000 as opposite to 2010 where people had already spoken more than one languages.
At first glance, we see that the Spain is the most popular one with 30% in 2000 and in 2012 people who spoke Spain slightly rose with 5%.Compared to Spain the interest in German remained stable between 2000 and 2010.Moreover, the figures for students who talked another languages and could speak 2 other languages increased by 5 percent from 2000 to 2010.Another interesting figure, was that people who could speak French decreased by 5% for over a period of time.In addition,between 2000 and 2010 the percentage of people who knew only one languages dropped down by 10%.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Stephanie Kaushal
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...Spain hold the first place over the two period of time.Also, the people who can speak only one...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...first place over the two period of time.Also, the people who can speak only one lang...
^^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one language', 'a language', or simply 'languages'?
Suggestion: one language; a language; languages
...ere people had already spoken more than one languages. At first glance, we see that the Spai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he most popular one with 30% in 2000 and in 2012 people who spoke Spain slightly ...
^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Compared
...e who spoke Spain slightly rose with 5%.Compared to Spain the interest in German remaine...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...n remained stable between 2000 and 2010.Moreover, the figures for students who talked an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Another
...ncreased by 5 percent from 2000 to 2010.Another interesting figure, was that people who...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...speak French decreased by 5% for over a period of time.In addition,between 2000 and 2010 the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...creased by 5% for over a period of time.In addition,between 2000 and 2010 the perc...
^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , between
...5% for over a period of time.In addition,between 2000 and 2010 the percentage of people ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one language', 'a language', or simply 'languages'?
Suggestion: one language; a language; languages
... the percentage of people who knew only one languages dropped down by 10%.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93377483444 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65786598005 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609271523179 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 22.4926829268 222% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 201.37085743 43.030603864 468% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 248.333333333 112.824112599 220% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.3333333333 22.9334400587 219% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.3333333333 5.23603664747 293% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311996392371 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207150699204 0.103423049105 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468179576229 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207150699204 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468179576229 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.0 13.2329268293 204% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.65 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.4 10.3012195122 198% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.0 10.9970731707 200% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.