The pie charts illustrate how languages were affected to British students in the year of 2000 and 2010. It can be clearly seen from the charts that students had more interest in Spanish than others.
In details, in 2000, the most striking figure was the percentage of students who were able to speak Spanish dominated the chart, with approximately 30%. Follow this piece was the amount of students who preferred sticking with English (their mother language), which contributed as nearly 20% of the chart. Pupils who tended ti be keen on French speaking and other languages speaking both had the same amount of participants. German speaking students and those who wanted to explore other languages had the least interest, with only 10% for each group.
Compare to the 2010 pie chart, it cannot be denied that students had more interest in learning Spanish and other language that are not listed, resulted in the 5% and 10% rise, by order. In contrast, the amount of students preferred speaking English and French got a small reduction, approximately 5% each segment. Meanwhile, the fraction in German speaking students remained unchanged.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities. 83
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10695187166 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59084148629 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1800490297 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273049088783 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125321854918 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551699855644 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196391461583 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281821084142 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.