The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts compare the percentages of British students who express other lingua with English in 2000 and 2010.
Overall,Spanish lingua was the most popular language along with English in both years,while German and two other languages became the least popular. There was slight decrease in the percentage of students who speak only English and French, whereas increase can be seen in the figures for Spanish and other languages.
The percentage of students who speak only Spanish in England accounted for less than a third (30%) in 2000. and this, then, inclined to more than a third (35%) in 2010.The rate of German speakers, by contrast, remained constant in both years at a mere 10 per cent.
The fraction of french and another language speakers were the second largest population (15%) in England in 2000, fell by 5% in French, 5% went upward in another language in 2010.In contrast, two other languages speakers increased from 10% to 15% in 2010. There was 10% decremented in the number of monolingual speakers to reached 10% in 2010.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-05 | rakholiyadivyesh50@gmail.com | 78 | view |
2018-08-12 | Ajayvir | 78 | view |
2021-01-03 | yash0724 | view | |
2019-11-12 | zeyneppy | 67 | view |
2021-11-19 | HappyCandy2 | 78 | view |
- the chart below show the percentage of male and female students getting top grades in 1960 and 2000 Summarise and information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 76
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- The bar chart below shows the number of miles travelled in a year by men and women for six different purposes in a particular country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 80
- Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punish 56
- As the world becomes technologically advanced, computers are replacing more and more jobs. Describe some job positions that may be lost because of computers, and discuss at least one problem that may result. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Spanish
...ith English in 2000 and 2010. Overall,Spanish lingua was the most popular language al...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...anguage along with English in both years,while German and two other languages became t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...nted for less than a third 30% in 2000. and this, then, inclined to more than a thi...
^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...clined to more than a third 35% in 2010.The rate of German speakers, by contrast, r...
^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...went upward in another language in 2010.In contrast, two other languages speakers ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, then, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97159090909 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61264185625 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551136363636 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5536691981 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245532220314 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117441973698 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690125188949 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15895143532 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052100788298 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.