The given pie charts illustrates the percentage of British students having abilities to communicate in languages other than English, for the year 2000 and 2010.
Overall, the trend shows that there is a 5% rise in proportion of Spanish speakers from the year 2000 to 2010(30% in 2000 and 35% in 2010) and also these speakers form the major part of total student population. While the number of German speakers has remained constant, the ratio of English only speakers has declined by 10% in 2010(was 20% in 2000).
Talking about French speakers, it is observed that there is a decline of 5% in 2010 as compared to 2000, which was total 15% then. Therefore making these speakers the smallest chunk of all.
On the other hand, the statistics for more than one language speakers shows 5% increase as compared to 10% in year 2000(is 15% in 2010). Along-with this progress, 5% more students were able to talk in another languages in 2010, which was total 15% in 2000.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ared to 2000, which was total 15% then. Therefore making these speakers the smallest chun...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, therefore, while, as to, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44540732942 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577380952381 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9445698366 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234674983823 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111356620232 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06285574865 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149418328979 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614286294694 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.