The two charts illustrate the findings of the research of the mature education on the information of people's studying purposes as well as people's opinion about the sharing in tuition fee for education.
Overall, the proportion of adults taking the course due to their interest in the subject is the highest whereas this percentage for the reason of meeting people is the lowest. The individuals' opinion that tuition fee for each course should be shared accounts for the largest.
From the first chart, It can be seen that the highest percentage with 40% of adults attending the course because of their keenness on the subject but only 9% of them enrolls the course for the purpose of meeting people. The objective of gaining qualifications ranks the second in the number of the growth- up. Improving prospects of promotion and enjoying learning/ studying are the two reasons with the same percentage of mature students' purposes of 20%. 22% of the adults think that the study is helpful for their current jobs and 12% of them considers studying for their ability to change jobs.
Turning to the second chart, the biggest proportion of adults has a thought that the tuition fee should be shared accounting for the highest at 40%. This percentage for tax payer and employers who have the same idea is 25% and 35% respectively.
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 73
- The table shows data about what people in the UK thought the government should increase spending on 73
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 67
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...on of meeting people is the lowest. The individuals opinion that tuition fee for each cours...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5640785412 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515555555556 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8223123731 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25221725748 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104143143822 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678840303549 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163990863682 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120972441277 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.