The information about the proportion of British pupils at university in England who were able to speak multiple languages in addition to English from 2000 to 2010 is depicted by the rendered pie charts. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
To begin with, the percentage of students who were able to speak two other languages other than English and German was 10, in 2000. However, this year, 20% of students were not able to communicate in other languages. The same number of pupils who spoke French and another language apart from English, which was 15%. Moreover, the most percentage of pupils were speaking in Spanish and English at University in 2000, it accounted for 30%.
Moving towards, in 2010, there had been drastic increase seen in the number of students who were talking in Spanish, other two languages and another language, it comprised to 35%, 15% and 20%. 10% of students were doing communication in French, German and not any languages other than English, it is interesting to note that.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that a large number of British students were able to speak in the Spanish language.
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 56
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively larger number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of the telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...m up, it can be vividly manifested that a large number of British students were able to speak in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, apart from, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91237113402 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61307669948 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541237113402 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7343424628 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.888888889 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396534707626 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169622879692 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113688282744 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251843264715 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935248480562 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.