The bar chart illustrates the export incomes of one particular country for five different products between 2015 and 2016, while the table compares the change in percentage for these five different export categories.
Overall, it is apparent that both of the year’s petroleum products earned the highest amount of money. It is also evident that income in the year 2016 outstripped all the five export products than in 2015 except for gems and jewelry.
According to the data, petroleum products earned $60 billion in 2015. After a 3% increase, it reached 61.8 billion dollars in 2016. Similarly, after a moderate rise from 2015 to 2016, engineering goods stood at approximately 61 billion dollars, which was slightly lesser than the earnings from petroleum products. Moreover, there was a minimal increase in export earnings in the case of agricultural goods (0.81%), while textiles products showed significant growth (15.24%) between the two successive years and eventually peaked at $31 billion.
By contrast, gems and jewelry demonstrated a decreasing trend from 2015 to 2016. In 2015, it earned approximately 42 billion dollars, while after a moderate fall (5.18%), it reached $40 billion in 2016.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The following appeared in a newspaper article about law firms in the city of Megalopolis In Megalopolis the number of law school graduates who went to work for larger corporate firms declined by 15 over the last three years whereas an increasing num 68
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Batavia newspaper The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago During this same time period 69
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, similarly, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29473684211 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7908437549 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573684210526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4313462298 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231543142665 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099360316936 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710566995552 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155444269838 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067730356361 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.