The bar graph depicts the information about the value of the states exports in five categories like petroleum products, engineered goods, gems and jewellery, agricultural products and textiles from 2015 to 2016. The table chart illustrates the information about the proportion change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
After analyzing, it can be seen clearly that petroleum products in 2015 earnings nearly $65 billions, in 2016 earnings increased by almost $2 billions in same field. However, in former year engineered goods earnings near about $6 billions in latter year earnings increased by nearly $5 billions. Gems and jewellery earnings around $55 billions in first and decreased by $2 billions in last year. Agricultural products were earnings almost identical in both years. In textiles field was lowest earnings in both year.
The table further collates that petroleum products value changed 3 percent from 2015 to 2016. While, engineered goods changed value 8.5 percentage. Germs and jewellery and textiles changed value in proportion 5.18% and 15.24% respectively. Agricultural products changed minimum value in percent only 0.18%.
Overall, maximum earning in petroleum products in both given year in first chart. In last chart, minimum percent changed in value in agricultural products.
- The maps below show the changes in a town after a construction of a hydroelectric power dam 73
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 56
- The flow chart below explains how laundry is handled Using information from the flow chart describe the laundry process 56
- In some countries governments are encouraging industries and business to move to regional areas outside the big cities Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The bar chart illustrates the number of people in the UK eating more than 5 portions of vegetables and fish per day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns, in 2016 earnings increased by almost billions in same field. However, in form...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ear engineered goods earnings near about billions in latter year earnings increas...
^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...latter year earnings increased by nearly billions. Gems and jewellery earnings ar...
^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...und 5 billions in first and decreased by billions in last year. Agricultural prod...
^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...ntical in both years. In textiles field was lowest earnings in both year. The table fur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ue changed 3 percent from 2015 to 2016. While, engineered goods changed value 8.5 per...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64141414141 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74708943377 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2833800819 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9230769231 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2307692308 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07692307692 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231241402748 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101554090766 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134910192363 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172911126522 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147854398244 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.84 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.