Given are the chart contrasting country's export earnings from 5 products in 2015 and a year later and a table elucidating on changes occured in values for the duration of these years
A single glance at the column chart provided reveals that except precious stones, expert rates increased for all products. The highest proportion was equally shared between petroleum products and engineering goods accounting for 62 billion dollars. In 2015, these figures amounted to nearly $60 billions and $58 billions respectively. Marginal increase of $1 billion was witnessed by agricultural products while textile industry observed a marked growth and both figures stood at $32 billions. However, export earnings for gems and jewelleries slipped from $44 billions to$40 billions.
As for the table, it is apparent that the highest value changes occurred in textile products at 15.24%. With the rate of 8.5% engineered goods were the second. Petroleum and agricultural products increased inconsiderably at a modest 3% and 0.81% respectively. However jewelleries declined in values at roughly 5%.
Overall it is noteworthy fact that modification of export earnings generated from 5 products highly correlated with their value changes in a year period
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: hnhung01
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the chart contrasting countrys export e...
^^^
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lions respectively. Marginal increase of billion was witnessed by agricultural pr...
^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... at a modest 3% and 0.81% respectively. However jewelleries declined in values at rough...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, well, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47894736842 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94756108393 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615789473684 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.8802547219 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123419827587 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486438330252 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461268940193 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987697283128 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578816031493 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.