The charts below sow the results of a questionaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010

The pie charts illustrate the percentage of tourist response in Parkway Hotel between 2005 and 2010.

At the first glance ,the proportion of excellent service was increased from 5% in 2005 to 28% in 2010. In addition ,the figure of statisfactory was noticed in 2005 below the 50 percent and 17% was observed in 2010. Futhermore ,the percentage of tourist response as poor service in Parkway Hotel was doubled of 2010 year (12%).

Turning to the remaining information in 2005 ,the visitor response very poor service was 15%. By 2010 ,it had declined gradually in 11 percent. Lastly the percentum of good service made by tourist were measured 14% in 2005 and 39% in 2010.

Overall ,it is clear from the given information ,the higher proportion of statisfactory service in 2005 and the least percentage of very poor service in 2010.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...en 2005 and 2010. At the first glance ,the proportion of excellent service was ...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...m 5% in 2005 to 28% in 2010. In addition ,the figure of statisfactory was noticed ...
^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...and 17% was observed in 2010. Futhermore ,the percentage of tourist response as po...
^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing to the remaining information in 2005 ,the visitor response very poor service w...
^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ponse very poor service was 15%. By 2010 ,it had declined gradually in 11 percent....
^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 14% in 2005 and 39% in 2010. Overall ,it is clear from the given information ,...
^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... ,it is clear from the given information ,the higher proportion of statisfactory ...
^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is clear from the given information ,the higher proportion of statisfactory servi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, lastly, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 696.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93617021277 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67092612889 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503546099291 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 195.3 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1102739225 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206300823934 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107580042959 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569002820578 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144314886671 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605109275985 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.