The charts show (Chart a) the average speed of urban zone traffic (in kilometers per hour or kph) in a number of countries over a fifty years period, including a future estimate; and also (Chart b) the total number of urban zones per country (in thousands)
The charts show the average velocity of city traffic over a fifty year timescale, with a forecast for the future, and also the amount of urban zones by country.
We can see that the general trend is for the speed to increase and then decrease. For example, in France, it increased from 60 kph in 1970 to a peak of 86 kph in 1990, tailing off to a forecast 52 kph in 2020. Similarly, we see the USA peak at 57 kph in 1990, declining to 43 kph at the end. The UK and Russia have a similar trend, rising to 56 and 72 kph respectively in 2010 before tailing to below the starting level. The same happens in Canada with a decline from 69 kph to 64 kph despite a peak of 73 kph.
Chile, however, fluctuates around 51 kph, but remains static over the period. Italy, Brazil, and Spain, by contrast, show a clear rise, finishing at 58, 57, and 61 kph respectively.
Regarding urban zones, all countries except one see predicted increases of roughly 4 times by 2020. The exception is Russia, which sees a fall of about half to 3,200.
Overall, the data does not suggest any correlation between increasing urban zones and average traffic speeds.
- The charts show Chart a the average speed of urban zone traffic in kilometers per hour or kph in a number of countries over a fifty years period including a future estimate and also Chart b the total number of urban zones per country in thousands 91
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 78
- The graphs below depict information about the Expenditure on Health and Education in the UAE (% of GDP) between 1985 and 1993, and also Infant Mortality and Life Expectancy from 1970 to 1992. 84
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 78
- The diagram shows the skeletal systems of two ancestors of modern human beings 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4619047619 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47632325651 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4500152322 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1818181818 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218718069764 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786344556609 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858766853841 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135310343862 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983329579556 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.