Presented is the bar graph illustrating the overall rate of cyberspace in five different European countries, while the pie chart gives the level of expense on buying online pattern.
Overall, it is transparent from the charts that using the internet was the most popular in the UK and Sweden, where residents paid for the highest amount of shopping online, the opposite was true for Spain in the given year.
To begin with, the rate of people accessed the internet in Sweden was accounted for the lion’s share at 35 percent, almost twice time higher than the figures for the UK at 20%. In contrast, the figure for those in Spain made up the minor proportion at 5%, and France had twice as same as the former country; however, it still lower than in comparison with German for 5%.
Next, we can see in the pie chart that the number of people who participated in internet in a nation was more and more. As a result, the percentage of buying online in the government was also more significant. The UK had the highest rate of expenditure per person on shopping cyberspace, and the second position is Sweden accounted for 28%. In contrast, Spain residents spent the lowest their wage in the field estimate at 4%, almost firth time and fourth time lower than France and Germany, respectively.
- The charts show the info about the use of the Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph below shows the land used for organic crops in two countries between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- the chart shows the number of internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013 73
- ome people give more importance to artists painter writers musicians in the current age of rapidly developing technology and science What do you think Do people prefer arts to technology in your view 89
- he maps below give information about a school in 2004 and the change of the same school in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, still, while, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71681415929 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52975092697 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557522123894 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.2121038046 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0704429690962 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306929732154 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311453548545 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0496245018252 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256141980672 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.