The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010

The assigned bar chart compares the proportion of individuals working in three distinct categories between Town A and Town B from 1960 to 2010

To begin with , In 1960 , The highest proportion of workers were working for sale at 41% ,which declined by 21% people in 2010. While , In Town A, The lowest figure was the manufacturing in 1960. Which accounted for 29%. However, the proportion of individuals who worked in manufacturing sector went up at 64% in 2010 respectively. Although, the percentage of people working in services clinched second position in 1960 by 30%. Yet , the figure of services dropped at 16% in 2010 correspondingly.

Probing further , In the comparison of town A , the wide number of workers were working in sales at 70% in 1960 in the Town B . After 50 years , The individuals who did work in sales factor were stabled at first position but it decreased by 23% in 2010. However , The percentage of people in services were maximum around 20 to 22% from 1960 to 2010 in town B. Therefore, The lowest figure of workers seemed in manufacturing field at 10% which rose at 25% in 2010 respectively.

Overall, The sales sector had the biggest workforce in town A and town B in 1960 . However, there are some significant changes in 2010. while, the manufacturing represents the main part in Town A

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...own B from 1960 to 2010 To begin with , In 1960 , The highest proportion of wo...
^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n B from 1960 to 2010 To begin with , In 1960 , The highest proportion of work...
^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...1960 to 2010 To begin with , In 1960 , The highest proportion of workers were ...
^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., The highest proportion of workers were working for sale at 41% ,which declined ...
^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...of workers were working for sale at 41% ,which declined by 21% people in 2010. Wh...
^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ch declined by 21% people in 2010. While , In Town A, The lowest figure was the ma...
^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1960. Which accounted for 29%. However, the proportion of individuals who worked...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or went up at 64% in 2010 respectively. Although, the percentage of people working in s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at 64% in 2010 respectively. Although, the percentage of people working in serv...
^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ched second position in 1960 by 30%. Yet , the figure of services dropped at 16% i...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opped at 16% in 2010 correspondingly. Probing further , In the comparison of t...
^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...10 correspondingly. Probing further , In the comparison of town A , the wide ...
^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng further , In the comparison of town A , the wide number of workers were working...
^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ng in sales at 70% in 1960 in the Town B . After 50 years , The individuals who di...
^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...% in 1960 in the Town B . After 50 years , The individuals who did work in sales f...
^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...but it decreased by 23% in 2010. However , The percentage of people in services we...
^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t workforce in town A and town B in 1960 . However, there are some significant cha...
^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...e are some significant changes in 2010. while, the manufacturing represents the main ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e are some significant changes in 2010. while, the manufacturing represents the main ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80176211454 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93161812025 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493392070485 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.5670101214 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8461538462 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 1.69756097561 1119% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372866935939 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135867078686 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869614184459 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248736142585 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216386886949 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.