The charts show where people get their news and how much they trust these sources.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These two bar charts provide information about the use and the trust of six different news sources.
At first glance, it is evident that there is more trust than mistrust to the various news sources and it is also obvious, by the second bar chart, that Local TV news is the most commonly used source of news while Magazines are the less.
In a more detailed description, Local TV news are also the most reliable of all (accredited with more than 50%). National Network, Newspapers, Radio News and Magazines also cherish a high percentage of trust as they are all on the level of 40% and above. Lastly, it is also obvious that people consider Online - only sources the most mistrusted by far, as they are the less trusted and the most mistrusted at the same time.
As for the sources used, it is clear that eight out of ten individuals interviewed use the Local TV news, while no other source has this rate. In fact, National Network, Newspapers and Radio News are between 75% and 55%. Finally, Online-only sources and Magazines are used by less than 50% and 40% respectively.
- Nowadays, more and more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or a negative development? 73
- It has been argued that gift giving should not be encouraged, because money is often wasted on things that people do not like or want. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this? 56
- The charts show where people get their news and how much they trust these sources.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by less than 50% and 40% respectively.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, lastly, second, so, while, as for, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71204188482 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46942567231 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539267015707 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2815635103 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130133515191 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665912570837 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603461017501 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104968911653 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628667632242 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.