The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple-producing countries in 2009 and 2019, and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The bar chart displays the number of pineapples exported from three key countries in 2009 and 2019. Meanwhile, the pie chart analyzes aspects included in the prices shown to consumers.
At a quick glance, there were three countries of A, B, and C which exported the most pineapples, and also there are 7 different types of distribution from the consumers' pineapples payments.
Regarding the pineapples productions, in 2009, country B took the lead sending out more than 4 million tonnes, which out-produced the other two by more than 2 million tonnes. However, in 2019, country A registered a profound increase in pineapple exports which sent out nearly 9 times the capacity in 2009. Country C remained the last runner among the three while country B produced less than half of their prior amount.
Breaking down the cost of pineapples into seven groups, as can be seen, distribution & retail accounted for more than one-third of the total cost. Moreover, 16% and 18% of the price belonged to tax services and profit funds respectively. Import licenses and transporting also took the total 22% in the pineapple prices. Lastly, export costs and producers added up to 9% of the cost.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, moreover, regarding, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08121827411 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77123655903 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649746192893 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9360739182 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344477572539 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134108270745 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956019566897 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204806699554 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406071923592 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.