The charts shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2021

The bar chart supplied compares the air pollution sources among four nations in the year of 2021.

Evident is that generally China had the highest pollution levels in all three aspects among four countries, whereas Australia had the best air quality overall.

In detail, in China, of three sources, industries produced 80 ppm in term of air pollution, where the lowest electricity factories still generated almost 60 ppm. A similar distribution can be seen on that in Japan, where industries is the leading polluting source of 43 ppm and electricity is the lowest, at around 15 ppm.

Meanwhile, although industry and electricity production generated fewer air pollutants, transportation was still a concern in America. It reached almost 60 ppm in terms of air pollution level. In contrast, Australia did a better job in controlling air qualities, none of the three aspects exceed 20 ppm.

In summary, China has the overall highest air pollution whilst Australia has the best air quality.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...icity is the lowest at around 15 ppm Meanwhile although industry and electricity produ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pollutants'' or 'pollutant's'?
Suggestion: pollutants'; pollutant's
...ctricity production generated fewer air pollutants transportation was still a concern in A...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, whereas, while, in contrast, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79273611356 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 160.0 22.4926829268 711% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 820.0 112.824112599 727% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 160.0 22.9334400587 698% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 55.0 5.23603664747 1050% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286667842781 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.286667842781 0.103423049105 277% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193801983137 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999940343722 0.0819641961636 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 82.7 13.2329268293 625% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -82.46 61.2550243902 -135% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.5 10.3012195122 626% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.66 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.62 8.06136585366 194% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 66.0 10.9970731707 600% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 57.0 11.0658536585 515% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.