The bar charts give information about the weight assessments of inhabitants of Charlestown in two years 1955 and 2015.
Overall, it is clear that Charlestown saw a considerable fluctuation in weight measurements of population over the period shown. In addition, the proportion of people who were obese rose dramatically in 2015 compared with 1955 in all age groups.
On the one hand ,in both years, around 70% of people aged 20-29 had ideal weight assessments and the figure was the same with the 30-39 age groups.However, this rate of people who were between 60 and 69 years old was about 50% in 1955 and fell to about 5% in 2015. These percentages of inhabitants aged 40-49 and 50-59 fell by about 15%, 20% respectively from 1955 to 2015. The proportion of the 20-29 age group being underweight was approximately 72% in 1955 and declined to 20% in 2015. These figures almost fell to 0% in three age groups in 2015 ( 30-39, 40-49 and 50-59). The percentage of underweight people who were between 60 and 69 years old decreased from 40% to about 12% in 2015.
On the other hand, the proportions of five age groups who were obese were under 10% in 1995 and in 2015,this rate went up considerably. in 2015, the highest percentage of obese people was the 60-69 age group, at approximately 60%, these figures of four groups were 2%, 10%, 25% and 50% in order of increased age groups. Charlestown witnessed a growth in the figure for overweight inhabitants in all groups except for the 50-59 age group. The proportion of overweight people aged 50-59 declined from about 10% in 1955 to 5% in 2015.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- The graph below shows the changes in the place where people used to surf the internet in the years 1998 2000 2002 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 44
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 100
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communication between managers and workers is important while other people said that other factors are more significant What is your opinion 84
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rable fluctuation in weight measurements of population over the period shown. In ...
^^
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion over the period shown. In addition, the proportion of people who were obese ...
^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...955 in all age groups. On the one hand ,in both years, around 70% of people aged...
^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... was the same with the 30-39 age groups.However, this rate of people who were between 6...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t fell to 0% in three age groups in 2015 30-39, 40-49 and 50-59. The percentage o...
^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...in 2015,this rate went up considerably. in 2015, the highest percentage of obese p...
^^
Line 4, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the 50-59 age group. The proportion of overweight people aged 50-59 declined fr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, except for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70967741935 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78668706519 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455197132616 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2393381104 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143171401689 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762382431131 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532053372864 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133585266233 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060137565244 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.48 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.