Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about whether or not financial background has a profound impact on children’s upbringing. Nonetheless, it is my views that children of poor families have the way to tackle problems effectively in adulthood than those from affluent families. This essay will view and analyze the controversy from various perspectives.
It is important to recognize that poverty pushes the young to step into society independently earlier. One reason for this is that those children have to learn to save money for themselves earlier, while others of the same age common have a carefree childhood. For instance, the real value of money as well as how hard is it to earn, the importance of family ties. Therefore, they automatically prepare for setting a target in life and make plans for catching up with them. It is understandable that many significant qualities of life are learned by these children from such a family in their earlier stages in life.
One can't deny that the children born in a low-income families are better in overcoming adversities. This is due to the fact that these children are accustomed to living a simple lifestyle. They learn how to share, take care of others, manage the budgets and most importantly become contented with whatever they have. Another example is that they have to sleep with their siblings in a small room instead of having their own room, with all the toys and comfortable beds in the room. Therefore, these children do not have many expensive and convenient things in their life, they would easily adapt to the harsh conditions.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that children from less fortunate families are better prepared for the future, although money and education build a better future life.
- When choosing a job, salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the number of students from four different countries enrolled at Avago Language School in Sydney.Between 1990 and 2000 the composition of the student body changed and the Asian economic crisis seriously affected the overall number of 78
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK citiy between 1989 and 2009 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 69
- the table below describe victim by age group offense categories in Venezuela 1999 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have different views about whether or not financial background has a profound imp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 5, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...in their earlier stages in life. One cant deny that the children born in a low-in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 5.60731707317 589% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 291.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0824742268 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81106377893 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 106.607317073 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591065292096 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 283.868780488 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5624986045 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.642857143 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210899509067 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742587161401 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525873267278 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13493114121 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343767756423 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.