The circular chart reveals the four main courses of land degradation and the tobular chart illustrates the different regions during the year of 1990. It shows the percentum.
The provided pie charts have four sections, each illustrates the reason of farmland degradation. however, the given table shows the effect of these causes on agricultural lands in three parts of world namely north america, europe and oceania during the 1990s.
As is presented in the pie chart, overgrazing and deforestation are the predominant reasons for losing the productivity of lands which together contribute to 65%. Next, man-made activities such as over-cultivation are responsible for degradation up to 28% which is almost 4 times larger than other factors.
According to data given in the table, In 19990, farmland of europe degraded to the much extent (23 percent land degraded) as compared to other regions, the cause behind this was deforestation. About 10% land lost productivity because of deforestation which is 5 times greater than Oceania. however, deforestation in north america was observed very less only 0.2 percent. Interestingly, in 1990, over cultivation had no effect on islands in the South Pacific. Nevertheless, in other two parts percentage remained between 3 to 8 percent. effect of overgrazing was very less in north america. however, it is almost 10 times larger in Oceania.
In conclusion, in 1990, europe and Oceania faced the higher problem of land degradation as compared to north america. The main causes behind it were deforestation and overgrazing.
- The tables below give the information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 56
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 50
- The chart shows unemployment rate and the number of people leaving Ireland from 1988 to 2008. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...tes the reason of farmland degradation. however, the given table shows the effect of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... which is 5 times greater than Oceania. however, deforestation in north america was obs...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Effect
...entage remained between 3 to 8 percent. effect of overgrazing was very less in north a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...grazing was very less in north america. however, it is almost 10 times larger in Oceani...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37899543379 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13616533959 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570776255708 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8837895156 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6153846154 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8461538462 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154699628768 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515822087247 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482697779506 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107393820538 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438661036138 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.