Coal consumption by sectors in the UK (in million tonnes)
The tables give information about the amount of coal which was used by different sectors in the UK from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, it can clearly be seen that the consumption of coal by all sectors decreased significantly, while power stations using coal which increased in the first period of five years, started in 1975. However, power stations was still the sector which consumed more coal than other sectors. In the total, the usage of coal by sectors in the UK experienced a dramatic decline over the time period shown.
Looking at the coal used for Power stations, it started at 77.2 million tones, before reaching a peak of 89.6 million in 1980. This figured then dropped to 84.0 million in 1985 and then continued going down to 59.6 million in 1990. After five years, the consumption of coal by power stations stood at 54.9 million. From 1995 until the end of the period, it experienced a significant drop to 47.1 million.
Turning to the domestic, this sector used 20.2 million tons of coal in 1975. Then, during the period of 15 years, it sharply fell to 2.7 million. Subsequently, this figure remained relatively stable at 2.7 million from 1990 to 1995. In 2000, the use of coal by domestic was less than the previous 0.1 million. The amount of coal which was consumed by industry stood at 19.6 million in 1975. After that, it decreased gradually from 7.9 million in 1980 to 3.2 in 2000. The use of coal by services was similar to industry consumption coal. There was a decline from 4.2 million in 1975 to 0.6 million in 1995. From 1995 to 2000, this figure remained unchanged.
In the total, the coal consumption of these sectors fell remarkably until the year 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- Below is a chart showing how many hours per week the average person spent on various kinds of media including watching TV surfing on the Internet listening to the radio and reading printed material The years covered are from 1990 to 2005 73
- adaptation when living in new country 73
- Many children these days have an unhealthy lifestyle Some people think schools are responsible for solving this problem and others believe it is the parents responsibility and parents are equally responsible for solving this problem Discuss both views and 67
- The government should regulate new developments and the authorities have a responsibility to protect important heritage buildings in Vietnam Do you agree 56
- Some people think the world would be better if we all spoke the same language Do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 33.7804878049 198% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 295.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70169491525 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44356232578 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454237288136 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.067444358 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0555555556 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.09268292683 342% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412061860174 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151814339572 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714015174033 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252297580666 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350784943696 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.