A glance at the provided table illustrates the information about the use of coal in the UK (in million tones) from 1975 to 2000 classified by four different sectors. In general, it is clearly apparent that the usage of coal both in all sectors and in total decreased gradually. However, power stations burned coal the most compared to the other spheres while services purpose consumed the least.
Looking in more detail from the table, in 1975, the expenditure of coal for power stations reached 77.2 million tonnes. Although it rose at 89.6 in the next five years, the figures started to decline gently in 1985 until 47.1 million tonnes in 2000. On the other hand, the other sectors which used coal much lower than power stations at the beginning of the period showed significant downward pattern since 1980. The domestic part which reported as the second highest coal consumer at 20.2 million tonnes in 1975 showed a dramatically decrease by nine tenth in 2000. Similarly, industrial coal intake which documented at 19.6 million tonnes in 1975 dropped considerably at 3.2 in two and half decades. Finally, coal used for services also felt year by year from 4.2 to 0.6 million tonnes.
- The diagram below shows information about member attendance at various clubs in a metro city 84
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by 4 types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 84
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the internet Do you agree or disagree 73
- the table below highlight data on the number of travellers using three major British airport between 1998 and 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...tion about the use of coal in the UK in million tones from 1975 to 2000 classified by f...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le services purpose consumed the least. Looking in more detail from the table, i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...r at 20.2 million tonnes in 1975 showed a dramatically decrease by nine tenth in 2000. Similarly, indus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by year from 4.2 to 0.6 million tonnes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, second, similarly, so, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90547263682 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45189353084 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601990049751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1390007669 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321586001738 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129921166983 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036120868828 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249748512244 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216966260394 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.