Compare road access to a city hospital 2007 and 2010

Essay topics:

Compare road access to a city hospital 2007 and 2010

The given two pictures illustrate how differently a city hospital was accessed by road in 2 the year 2007 and 2010.

Overall, what stands out from the comparison between such two maps is the modernization of transport surrounding the hospital including related construction works. Even though, there are some roads and facilities which remain unchanged.

Looking at the information in more detail, two roundabouts will be integrated into two intersections of Hospital Road and Ring Road, City Road. As a result of this, traffic will be paved the way to be smoother. The occurrence of a bus station in the southwest will replace the six bus stops alongside Hospital Road. In addition, the public car park will be constructed separately next to the right side of the hospital to provide enough space for an increasing number of patients and their relatives’ cars.

There is no plan to change or widen Ring Road, Hospital Road, and City Road. The parking area for staff will stay at the same place where is previously reserved for both public and staff’s vehicles.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-12-30 bilalemail@gmail.com 84 view
Essays by user bilalemail@gmail.com :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, in addition, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07303370787 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88836719749 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64606741573 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4079374511 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338499661602 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143748001851 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151663596528 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225318527667 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13875669133 0.0819641961636 169% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.