The given graph illustrates the fast foods(pizza, fish and chips and hamburgers) consumption by teenagers of Australia between 1975 to 2000.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were considerable upward trends in the number of times eaten per year of both pizza and hamburgers, while the number of times eaten per year of fish and chips saw a considerable fall over the period. Another noticeable point is that fish and chips were the most popular fast food items in 1975, but in 2000 hamburgers was the number one.
Looking at the details, as regards pizza, the number of times eaten per year started at 5 in 1975, there was a gradual rise until around 1995, at which point it leveled off at nearly 82 times of eaten per year until 2000. If we look at hamburgers, the trend was similar increased significantly at approximately reaching to 82 times per year to 1985, the figure then went up gradually reaching almost 100 in 1995. Then, there was a almost steady in value to finishing in 2000.
By contrast, the number of times eaten per year of fish and chips went in opposite direction. By beginning at 100 in 1975, with a gradual decrease until 1980, then it witnessed a gentle fluctuation, and again considerable decline to the value to 40 number of times eaten per year in 2000.
- Development in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both view and give 61
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 67
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales (in various formats) of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011. 67
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ing almost 100 in 1995. Then, there was a almost steady in value to finishing in ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66233766234 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56595683523 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7494855945 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.625 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0643468862296 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443927400713 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810490561768 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724178766178 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936570329096 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.