The line charts compares fish and some different kinds of meat, namely chicken, beef, lamb, in terms of their individual demand per week in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
It is clear that fish was the least commonly used food in the European country throughout the period shown. Also, the expenditure on beef, lamb and fish decrease, while there was a fluctuating increase in the figure for chicken.
In 1979, beef’s intake was the highest, at about 220 grams per person per week. This figure followed by the consumption of lamb and chicken, at approximately 150 grams and 145 grams respectively. Meanwhile, each person ate only 60 grams fish per week.
During the following years, the country saw a significant growth to around 250 grams in the consumption of chicken. By contrast, the demand of beef and lamb halved to 100 grams and 75 grams per week respectively . By contrast, there was a slight fell in the consumption of fish, with the figure decreasing by about 10 grams in 2004.
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat. 78
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow the children to do what they want.Is this a good way to raise children 84
- In many countries, children are getting fatter and less fit day by day. Why is it so and suggest solutions. 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...grams and 75 grams per week respectively . By contrast, there was a slight fell in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87209302326 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67646911416 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563953488372 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8788952659 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202861653695 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825090575258 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843572271917 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133520311889 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954801161085 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.