the development of a fishing village to the hotel resort

Two maps show the changes of turning the fishing village to a hotel resort and the effect of development.

It is can be clearly seen that there are new roads have been added to connect the hotel resort with other cities which also have been created upon the new purposes. New buildings on the beach were created. In addition to the reclamation process of the behind mountains than the map of a fishing village. While, the farms were turned to natural parks which located in behind sanitation area. However, some maintenance was added to the beaches with new aims, its still have the same shape. Also, the old village is still found on the second map of hotel resort of it. whereas, not only the fishing career is removed from the new target of village, also the agriculture sector is not be found in the map of hotel resort.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng the fishing village to a hotel resort and the effect of development. It is ...
^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ains than the map of a fishing village. While, the farms were turned to natural parks...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...was added to the beaches with new aims, its still have the same shape. Also, the ol...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, still, whereas, while, in addition, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 681.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57046979866 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24522475215 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1599162405 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.125 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282208693037 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130968138896 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136002799061 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29944922584 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881080295272 0.0819641961636 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.