the development of a fishing village to the hotel resort

The two maps elucidate development process to convert a fishing area to hotel resort for tourism.
Looking for first map, it is can be clearly seen fishing area with fishing ships in sea and small building area with narrow road, with no services, however that area can be developed
Moving on the second map, after the development process you can see a new city was created with wonderful instructions with roads to connect the hotels area within beach area, also new vertical road of the end another city was built. The older road has many new instructions and has become a lot of services and widely more. There are agriculture areas in the village.
However, some maintenance was added to the beaches with new aims, its still have the same shape. Also, the old village is still found on the second map of hotel resort of it. whereas, not only the fishing career is removed from the new target of village, also the agriculture sector is not be found in the map of hotel resort.
In conclusion, the second map modern and better more than the first map and that have anew activity for tourism.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ices, however that area can be developed Moving on the second map, after the deve...
^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hotels'' or 'hotel's'?
Suggestion: hotels'; hotel's
... instructions with roads to connect the hotels area within beach area, also new vertic...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...was added to the beaches with new aims, its still have the same shape. Also, the ol...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, second, so, still, whereas, in conclusion, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64102564103 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31292853236 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 110.824114592 43.030603864 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 113.125 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251619606531 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121566157923 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137403081147 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156931180141 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132263075712 0.0819641961636 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.