The graphs compare 6 different types of position in terms of the percentage of employees in two year 1998 and 2001.
It is clear from the charts that the proportions of workers with a fulltime job by far were highest during the research period. Additionally, in the period of 4 years, only the figures for unemployed people and contract workers experienced rises.
In 1998, 37% of those surveyed had a fulltime job, while 27% of the sample were part-time workers. Moreover, the proportions of self-employed and contract employees were 19% and 12% respectively. By contrast, the percentages of casual individuals and people without a job were smallest, while the former made up 3% of the sample, the latter occupied only 2%.
By 2001, the percentage of people with a fulltime job had fallen by 10% to 27%, in comparison with contact workers, which had risen to around 16%. In the same year, the figures for self employees and casual workers remained the same, at roughly 19% and 3% respectively. By contrast, the proportion of jobless people increased by 4% to 6%.
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking? 78
- The bar chart shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department.The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged 18-30 and those aged 45-60,and shows factors affecting their work performance. 84
- The diagram below contain information regarding the percentage of people occupied in various type of position in 1999 and 2001 50
- The figure gives information about smoking habit of the UK population by age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92817679558 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86679115023 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2443409538 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1111111111 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131321462059 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569233143199 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636617946057 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933768044302 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061711778624 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.