The graph compares four different gaming platforms in terms of worldwide sales between 2000 and 2006.
It is clear that handheld sector by far had the highest turnover during the research period. Additionally, sales of games for three out of for platforms rose gradually except for console games.
In 2000, sales of handheld games was around 11 billion dollars, while console games earned roughly 6 million dollars. No figures were given for mobile phone and online games that year. Over the next four years, sales of handheld video games increased to around 15 million dollars, whereas the figure for console games declined steadily to 4 billion dollars. At the same time, online and mobile games started to become popular, both turnovers reached to around 3 billion dollars each.
In 2006, sales of handheld, online and mobile games reached peaks of 17, 9 and 7 billion dollars respectively. By contrast, the figure for console games dropped to its lowest point, at around 2.5 million dollars.
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 76
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 89
- The table shows the percentage of workers in agriculture manufacturing and services in 7 European countries in 2014 71
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 81
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12804878049 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36656859954 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1538824726 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266531505235 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13046300734 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111198748694 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199393977592 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114363754295 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.