The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000

The given diagram depicts number of parcel in thousands, processed by FedEx and TNT over eighty years period from 1920 to 2000. It is obvious from diagram that FedEx as a leader at the beginning of the period experienced downward trend, when TNT showed sharp increase of delivered parcel at the end of the period.

FedEx, in 1920, delivered to customers around 15000 parcels and over next twenty years this number increased nearly about 10 thousand. However in 1940, FedEx experienced rapid dip to nearly 12 thousand. In 1960, followed by steady raise to roughly 17500 delivered parcels.

From the other hand, TNT in 1920 handled slightly above 5000 parcel. But in next four decades transported amount of parcels increased about 1,2 times to approximately 12 thousand. Getting back to the data, after 20 years in 1980, parcels transported by TNT sharply peaked to about 23000 and ended in just under 25000 in 2000.

To sum up, despite the fact that FedEx have been major mail carrier in 1920, TNT delivered significantly more mail at the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 9 (4 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ber increased nearly about 10 thousand. However in 1940, FedEx experienced rapid dip to...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'parcel' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'parcels'.
Suggestion: parcels
...TNT in 1920 handled slightly above 5000 parcel. But in next four decades transported a...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92222222222 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46333608981 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8342473267 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279645571274 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115455345478 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663786968755 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166431453991 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271967048515 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.