the diagram below gives information about the proportion of passenger kilometers traveled by different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996 and one possible projection for their use in 2030 1996 Bus 39 Walking 7 Scooter 12 Bicycle 27 Train 0 Car 15 2030

Essay topics:

the diagram below gives information about the proportion of passenger kilometers traveled by different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996 and one possible projection for their use in 2030.

1996:
Bus: 39%
Walking: 7%
Scooter: 12%
Bicycle: 27%
Train: 0%
Car: 15%

2030:
Bus: 22%
Walking: 3%
Scooter: 7%
Train:13%
Bus: 52%

The bar chart compares the percentage of 6 types of transport that travelers used in Shanghai in 1996 and the prediction in 2030. Generally, it is forecasted that car and bus will increase while others will decrease in 2030.

While the bus usage in 1996 reaches a high peak of 39%, only 22% will be used in 2030. The proportion of walking and scooter in 1996 was 7% and 12%, in turn. And it is predicted that the figure will slightly decrease to 3% and 7% respectively. Three times as many bicycles were used in 1996 as it will be used in 2030.

By contrast, there is no data for trains in 1996 but this figure will experience an upward trend to 13%. The percentage of car is predicted to reach its higher point in 2030, at 52%.

Votes
Average: 4.3 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-14 iaohk 43 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 597.0 965.302439024 62% => OK
No of words: 138.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32608695652 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42743929552 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43923204556 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 168.3 283.868780488 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.0238557196 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.625 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268429596317 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12297627386 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710953532138 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184958796759 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455175689076 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.54 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.